Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Literacy in Song of Solomon, Life of Frederick Douglass, Push and Slave Narratives :: comparison compare contrast essays

Investigation of Language and Literacy in Song of Solomon, Life of Frederick Douglass, Push and Slave Narratives   â â â African-Americans have been adding to American writing for many years. From Gustavus Vassa, or Olaudah Equiano, in 1789 to Sapphire in 1996, scholars have been recounting to their accounts. The impact of minority authors and speakers on writing, proficiency, and language is absolutely remarkable.  As a matter of first importance, dark American writing enables others to hear the minority voice and vicariously share the minority experience. The regular white peruser can't comprehend what the dark race experiences on an every day and generational premise; be that as it may, writing can carry the white peruser into the minority's reality by taking advantage of the peruser's creative mind and feelings.  The primary motivation behind the slave stories is to let perusers share the slaves' encounters, and thus evoke feelings with the goal that the peruser will consider, and ideally follow up on, abolitionist standards. In the introduction to Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, William Lloyd Garrison expounds on Douglass and the white northerners whose compassion and warmth he has firmly made sure about by the numerous sufferings he has persevered through, ...whose minds he has edified regarding the matter of bondage, and who have been liquefied to tears by his poignancy, or animated to upright ire by his mixing expressiveness against the enslavers of men (ix). Douglass was absolutely mindful of his strategic upset the open psyche and win the hearts of others (xii). He accomplished this reason through his voice immovably recounting to the pathetic story of his slave encounters. How could his crowd deliberately ignore such expert articulation and force?  Like Douglass, Sapphire offers the minority involvement in the advantaged populace. She accomplishes this accomplishment through the character Precious and her remarkable voice. The minority voice is particular and unavoidable, for the voice portrays the story. For instance, Precious stands out her background from the prevailing class' encounters: What is a typical life? A real existence where you not 'disgraced of your mom. Where your companions come over after school and sit in front of the TV and do schoolwork. Where your mom is typical looking and don't hit you over the head wif iron skillet. I would want in my dream another opportunity. Since my first possibility go to Mama and Daddy (Sapphire 114-115). These ground-breaking proclamations from the voice of a multi year old African-American young lady carry the white peruser into the truth of the life of the minority.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Nipah Virus and the Potential for Bioterrorism

Nipah Virus and the Potential for Bioterrorism Nipah Virus and the Potential for Bioterrorism Presentation Bioterrorism is viewed as one of the most discussed issues with respect to national security since the beginning of the new thousand years. On September 11, 2001 (9/11) psychological oppression hit the United States with the smashing and endeavored slamming of planes into critical monetary and political structures. This demonstration of dread was a critical starting to fears of what was next from psychological militant gatherings. Despite the fact that this was not the first, and certainly not the last, psychological oppressor danger or endeavor it was certainly the most significant and irrefutably caused dread, frenzy and social interruption substantially less financial issues all around. Inside days of the 9/11 assaults the attention to American defenselessness turned out to be progressively obvious with the media exposure of the Anthrax alarms. This realized worldwide worries with bioterrorism as envelopes that were loaded up with Bacillus anthracis spores were sent to political and media sources all through the United States and twenty-two individuals were tainted and five passings happened (Ryan Glarum, 2008). Nipah is only one of numerous infections that are accessible to fear based oppressor bunches for advancement as a bioweapon. In 1999 this infection was first seen and noted as effectively spread to people through inward breath and ingestion. Despite the fact that there are numerous potential pathogens accessible, the Nipah infection has demonstrated itself to be one of the most perilous and beneficial . As the Nipah infection advanced there was dread noted by laborers, families and human services suppliers in southern Asia. With a death pace of 40% to 100% (Lam, 2002; World Health Organization [WHO], 2009) in tainted territories, and a monetary effect that cost a few millions to Malaysias economy, this infection has potential for huge bioterrorism. Characteristic History The Nipah Virus (NiV), family paramyxoviridae, was first perceived in Malaysia, South Asia in late 1998 into Spring 1999. This ailment was perceived when a flare-up of affliction and passing happened among pig ranchers, it tainted 265 individuals, with 105 passings, a death pace of around 40% (Lam, 2002). This infection was new to established researchers and first idea to be Japanese Encephalitis (JE) which had happened in around a similar area years sooner. JE was likewise noted to taint individuals that were around trained pigs, much the same as the presently recognized Nipah Virus (Center for Disease Control [CDC], 2001). The Nipah infection was found to likewise have comparative manifestations as those of the Hendra Virus which caused respiratory malady and encephalitis in Australia in 1994 (Fraser, 2009). The Nipah infection is considered by the CDC as a recently developing pathogen that could be built for mass spread (Ryan Glarum, 2008; Center for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], n.d.). Since the beginning of the Nipah infection in 1999, as indicated by the World Health Organization (WHO), there have been twelve huge flare-ups since the underlying, with 202 people contaminated and lost existence of 146 people, mortality of over 72%. Two of these flare-ups, one in India in 2007 and one in Bangladesh in 2008 had death paces of 100%, indicating the overwhelming impacts of this infection (WHO, 2009). The underlying examination of the Nipah infection found that abattoir laborers who managed pigs every day and those that were uncovered through cultivating and moving pigs were getting sick. As the examination proceeded with it found that the pigs were contaminating the laborers (zoonotic ailment). After disclosure, in this way over 1.1 million pigs were discarded to control the transmission of the infection. This obliteration of pigs was essentially decimating to the economy of Malaysia taking note of an expected loss of $217 million dollars (Ryan Glarum, 2008, p. 104). Infection Transference The Nipah infection have was seen as pteropid bats (flying foxes), situated in Australia and the southern territories of Asia. During development of homesteads toward the rainforests and the devastation of the rainforest for assembling and industry, numerous creatures including bats needed to move to endure. Many pig ranchers in Malaysia additionally had enormous natural product plantations arranged close to the pig fenced in areas, as development of pig cultivating proceeded and the loss of territory for bats continued to change bats began to rummage the close by plantations for food. As this movement proceeded there was an expanded possibility of malady defilement to household creatures from untamed life, and as such a huge increment in contact among pigs and bats. In this manner, more noteworthy open door for transmission of the Nipah infection (â€Å"Dr. Jonathan Epstein Returnsâ€Å", 2005). As the Nipah infection was explored it was accepted to have been transmitted to pigs from bats through the spit, pee and excrement of the bats which feed and home in neighborhood plantations (â€Å"Dr. Jonathan Epstein Returnsâ€Å", 2005), close to pig pens. This potential transmission most likely happened when bat emissions fell into the pig pens and were ingested by these tamed creatures. The underlying human infection episode in Malaysia and Singapore was accepted to have been from direct contact with wiped out pigs or their meat items, and could have originated from the utilization of tainted organic product or juices from the plantations. As the infection advanced and look into was done there was a built up interface taking note of individual to-individual pollution through close contact (World Health Organization [WHO], 2009) Physiology of Exposure The Nipah infection appears to have a wide range of clinical indications in singular creatures and people. There is an expansive scope of center signs that can highlight infection contamination that prompt specialists and social insurance suppliers to not perceive examples of beginning contamination, in this manner not perceiving potential sickness flare-ups. As per the WHO (2009), the hatching time frame (interim from contamination to beginning of indications) shifts from four to 45 days. This huge range makes it unbelievably difficult to follow the infection between beginning presentation and clinical treatment. Perceiving that the individual is giving indications of an infection, and narrowing down the particular infection, at that point treating it fittingly for an individual is a test yet possible. However, with such a wide brooding period there is a likelihood that reasonable data could be lost or not took note. The physiological indications of this infection in people is described by vague signs and side effects to incorporate serious migraine, fever, spewing, myalgia (solid torment) bewilderment, respiratory maladies, neurological deficiencies and encephalitis and by and large may cause extreme lethargies or passing (Center for Infectious Disease Research Policy [CIDRAP], 2009). In pigs there is portrayal of signs and manifestations relying upon the age of the creature. The essential signs noted are fever, brevity of breath, muscle jerking, trembling, back leg shortcoming, extreme hacking, open-mouth breathing, irregular posing and spasms (CIDRAP, 2009). After introductory presentation and treatment follow-up inquire about was done and in this examination it was noticed that there were backslides in center side effects to incorporate encephalitis up to twenty after two months, without re-introduction. The examination and that an expected 160 patients who recuperated from intense encephalitis and 89 patients who experienced asymptomatic disease got follow-up care for ‘late-beginning encephalitis (neurological appearances happening just because at least ten weeks after starting contamination) or ‘relapsed encephalitis (neurological indications after recuperation from intense encephalitis) (Halpin Mungall, 2007, p. 290). Host Sources The Nipah Virus source originates from Pteropus organic product bats (AKA: Flying Foxes), which are found in Southern Asia and Australia. In 1997 organic product bats were noted to start rummaging on blossoms and nectar in trees situated close to plantations bordering to tainted territories (Cobey, 2005). Organic product bats were seen as the common wellspring of this infection and made the exchange of the infection pigs and individuals. As tamed pigs were sold for reproducing and moved to different homesteads the infection was immediately spread further all through southern Asia (Cobey, 2005). Conceivable Use in Biowarfare Biowarfare, and these days bioterrorism, is a danger that started before the introduction of Christ. As per Dr. Michael D. Phillips, M.D. one of the principal recorded episodes [of bioterrorism]was in Mesopotamia. The Assyrians utilized rye ergot, a component of the parasite Claviceps purpurea, which contains mycotoxins. Rye ergot was utilized by Assyria to harm the wells of their foes, with restricted achievement (Phillips, 2005, p. 32). Utilization of pathogens to initiate disorder, demise or fear has proceeded until present time. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recorded the Nipah infection as a basic organic operator, Category C. Classification C specialists are rising pathogens that could be designed for mass dispersal later on in light of: * Availability * Ease of creation and spread * Potential for high grimness and death rates and significant wellbeing sway (Center for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], n.d.,  ¶ 3; (Ryan Glarum, 2008, p. 105)) With this classification the infection is a living pathogen that can be created as a bioweapon with the correct information, and gear. For the infection to be weaponized it should be cleaned, balanced out and appropriately measured. Since this is a living infection the bioterrorist specialist can be repeated once dispersed (Ryan Glarum, 2008). As of now, there is no data about how this infection could be produced to turn into a bioterrorist specialist, however with the correct information the potential is there. Creation Methods Since the Nipah infection has demonstrated to be scattered through emissions from bats and pigs, and appeared to cause serious disease and demise it can possibly be utilized as a bioterrorist operator

Tuesday, August 4, 2020

9 Signs Youre Dealing With an Emotional Manipulator

9 Signs Youre Dealing With an Emotional Manipulator WHAT IS EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION?Ever b??n in a situation where ??u find yourself ???l?gizing f?r ??m?thing you ?l??rl? didn’t do? Y?u find ??ur??lf t?king th? bl?m? for something ??m??n? ?l?? did?Th??? ?itu?ti?n? are m?r? ??mm?n th??? d??? ?nd it i? usually as a r??ult ?f ?m?ti?n?l m?ni?ul?ti?n?.If ??u’v? ?v?r found ??ur??lf in a ?itu?ti?n where someone d??? ??m?thing t? hurt ??u ?nd during th? course ?f th? discussion ?b?ut what h????n?d ?nd ??u find ??ur??lf apologizing ?nd bl?ming yourself, H?ll?! You’ve b??n ?m?ti?n?ll? m?ni?ul?t?d.Emotional manipulation whi?h is ?l?? kn?wn as ????h?l?gi??l m?ni?ul?ti?n is defined as th? b?h?vi?r th?t is intended t? change the ?ttitud? or behavior of ?th?r ????l? by u?ing devious, deceptive ?r ?v?n ?bu?iv? means with th? intention t? ??iz? ??w?r, ??ntr?l, benefits and/or privileges ?t th? vi?tim’? expense.It is important t? distinguish healthy social influence from emotional manipulation.Healthy social influ?n?? ???ur? between m??t ????l?, and is part ?f the give ?nd t?k? ?itu?ti?n? ?f ??n?tru?tiv? r?l?ti?n?hi??.In emotional manipulation on th? other hand, you ?r? being u??d f?r th? b?n?fit ?f th? ?th?r ??rt?. The m?ni?ul?t?r d?lib?r?t?l? ?r??t?? ?n ?tm???h?r? wh?r? he ?r ?h? exploits you in such a way th?t it serves hi? ?r her agenda. SIGN? OF EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION AND ?R??TI??L ?X?M?L??1. They never take r????n?ibilit? ?????i?ll? wh?n thing? dont g? w?llH?v? you ever m?t one ?f those kinds ?f ????l? who n?v?r d? ?n?thing wr?ng? Or ?t l???t th?t i? what they b?li?v?.I know I have. It’s n?v?r ever th?ir fault. It’s ?lw??? ??u, n?t th?m.Its ??tu?ll? ?l??r th?t it w?? hi? f?ult, but he’d n?v?r agree to that.Ev?r?thing that has ?v?r h????n?d to them i? usually something th?? h?d n? control over ?? they ?l?im. “H? fired m? because h? didn’t lik? m?” ?r “She br?k? up with m? because ?h? ??uldn’t handle being in a r?l?ti?n?hi?”.Th? excuses they m?k? u? t? ??nvin?? th?m??lv??, ?nd ?th?r?, ?f th?ir l??k ?f fault ?r? ??t?ni?hing.S?m?tim?? b?d things happen to g??d ????l? but, ?v?n th? g??d ????l? kn?w th?t ??m? ?f those bad things w?r? avoidable if th?? d?n? ??m?thing different ?nd th?? ?????t th?? made a mi?t?k?? m?ving f?rw?rd, but ?m?ti?n?l manipulators ?lw??? b?li?v? it’s your f?ult.And they do ?nd say everything to ??nvin?? you th?t ??u ?r? th? ?r?bl?m. H?w t? react: you h?v? t? ??lit?l? ?x?l?in t? them with examples if possible h?w and wh?r? th?? did ??m?thing wrong. They will ?till tr? to ?hift th? bl?m? ?g?in to ??u, but ?t thi? ??int, ??u ??uld ju?t w?rk away. They will g?t the m????g? ?v?ntu?ll?.2. Th?? tr? to make ??u f??l b?d f?r d?ing wh?t ??u w?nt, putting th?ir needs above yoursA ?tud? fr?m C?rl?t?n University inv??tig?t?d guilt m?ng?ring as ?n unh??lth? fr?ntlin? relationship m?n??uvr? that m?ni?ul?t?r? fr??u?ntl? u??.Th? ?l???i? guilt tri? m?v?.Em?ti?n?l m?ni?ul?t?r? ?ll have thi? in ??mm?n.Y?u want t? d? something ??u lik? ?nd th?? ?r? lik? “fin?, ?ur?, g? h?ng ? ut with your friends while I ?t?? ?t home lonely” th?? will go ahead t? remind you that their gr?ndm? di?d thi? m?nth 30-years ago and you want to g? have fun with friends and let them mourn ?l?n?.Ev?r?thing h?? t? be about them, ??u ??n’t ?v?n have an i?? cream without th?m m?gi??ll? finding a r????n wh? ??u ?h?uldn’t b???u?? ?f how it affects th?m. “If ??u r??ll? want to go ?n the girl’? w??k?nd, g? ?h??d. I ju?t d?nt und?r?t?nd h?w ??u ??uld leave th? kids ?l?n? with m? f?r th?t long.”Th?? lit?r?ll? don’t ???r?v? ?f ??ur h???in???, only th?ir?. If h? ?r ?h? h?? a b?d d??, ??u d?r? n?t w?t?h a funn? move th?t would m?k? ??u l?ugh b???u?? th?? w?uld ??nd?mn you f?r h?ving a g??d tim?. “I had a b?d d?? ?t th? ?ffi?? t?d?? ?nd ??u are w?t?hing a funn? m?vi? ?nd l?ughing about it, I know ??u d?n’t ??r?, but please ?r?t?nd t? care a bit or wait till I l??v?”.If th?? ?r? n?t b?n?fiting directly from wh?t th?? ?r? d?ing, th?n you ?r? ??lfi?h, only thinking ?b?ut ??ur? ?lf. Th?t is one major ?ign ??u are d??ling with ?n ?m?ti?n?l m?ni?ul?t?r.How t? react: ??u ?im?l? have to kn?w th?t no one is r????n?ibl? f?r your h???in???. Y?u ?l?? d? not owe your h???in??? t? ?n?b?d?. The b??t response t? thi? ?itu?ti?n is t? ign?r? th? ?bu??r and do what makes ??u h???? and ??u don’t have t? ???l?gi?? for it.3. Th?? tr? t? b? th? ??nt?r ?f ?tt?nti?n, m?king ??u f??l less or inferiorIt’s ?ll ?b?ut their career, it’? ?ll ?b?ut how th?? w?nt t? ?u????d and h?w ??u ?h?uld help th?m g?t t? wh?r? they w?nt t? b?.You ?r? not ?ll?w?d t? h?v? dreams, th?ir ?mbiti?n? ?r? m?r? im??rt?nt th?n ??ur?.Everything just h?? to be ?b?ut them.Th?? w?nt to t?lk about th?ir d??, their problems, ?nd th?ir ??hi?v?m?nt?. Yours do not m?tt?r. Wh?t?v?r ?r?bl?m ??u ?r? h?ving; th?? are g?ing thr?ugh or h?v? g?n? through worse. You h?d a g??d d?? at w?rk t?d??? Th?ir day was ?v?n b?tt?r. You had a bad d?? ?t w?rk? Th?? g?t th?t award ?nd ?v?r?b?d? l?v?d him ?r h?r. “C?m? on, your ??hi?v?m?nt? ?r? n?ting ??m??r?d t? min?, I ??uld d? wh?t ??u d? in m? ?l???”.Y?u basically b???m? invincible. Wh?n ????king with a m?ni?ul?t?r, ??u find ??ur??lf gr?du?ll? f?lling int? a ?t?t? of ??n?t?nt li?t?ning with v?r? littl? ??ntributi?n. Th?? simply cannot l??k ???t th?m??lv?? t? notice anyone ?l??.H?w to r???t: like in th? previous r????n??, no ?n? i? r????n?ibl? f?r your h???in??? ?r life. When they m?k? ?v?r? di??u??i?n about th?m, try t? dr?w th?ir attention t? the f??t th?t they ?r? being ??lfi?h and ??lf-??nt?r?d. And if that d???n’t work, you sincerely don’t n??d t? b? in that r?l?ti?n?hi?.4. Th?? m?k? ??u f??l ??rr? f?r v?i?ing concerns or ??m?l?int? d???it? them being genuineTh?? ?lw??? w?nt ??u t? ??u t? keep ??ur ??ini?n? to ??ur??lf.S?m?tim?? th?? ?v?n ask th? ?u??ti?n and demand ??u ?gr?? with them.F?r in?t?n??, th?? want t? g?t a r??ll? ?x??n?iv? ?tuff whi?h b??i??ll? i? ?f no use to th?m or ??u, or the ?ntir? f?mil?; they ju?t l?v? th? id?? ?f owning it .Th?n they w?uld ??k f?r ??ur opinion ?b?ut it, kn?wing fully well you w?uld ??? no, but when you d?, th?? ?l?? it ?? if ??u d?n’t want th?m to b? h????.Th?n, ?ll ?f a ?udd?n, ??u find yourself apologizing and ?v?n ?gr??ing to more.Generally, wh?n ??u mention something th?t bothers ??u, th?? m?k? you feel ??rr? f?r bringing it u?. Y?u ??n never express ??ur concerns with?ut f??r ?f r??ri??l.Th?ir id?? i? to f?r?? you t? k??? ??ur complaints t? ??ur??lf ?nd turn the f??u? b??k t? th?m. Th??? ?r? characteristics ?f an ?m?ti?n?l manipulator.How t? r???t: Y?u are n?t g?ing ?r?z?. Th?? ?r? ?l??ing ??u f?r ?ll it? worth. D?nt fall vi?tim to th??? m?ni?ul?tiv?, guilt-l?d?n ?h?n?nig?n?. D?nt give in to th?ir ????iv? demands or r??u??t? f?r ??m??th?. This ??r??n i? ?n ?dult. R?mind th?m ?f that, and how th?? are ??rf??tl? ?bl? to ???? with your d??i?i?n ?r actions.5. Th?? diminish ??ur ?r?bl?m? or diffi?ulti??Emotional m?ni?ul?t?r? dont ??r? mu?h about ??ur ?r?bl?m?, unless th?? can u?? th ?m ?? a platform to highlight their own situation. “You think you h?d it bad sitting in tr?ffi? today? Did ??u ever think ?b?ut h?w I have t? d??l with tr?ffi? ?v?r? day? It t?k?? ???r? off m? lif?. B? th?nkful ??u only h?d to d??l with it t?d??.”“Gosh, th?t? terrible ??u ?nd ??ur m?m h?d a fight. Well, just be thankful ??u h?v? a m?m. My mom is d??d, and even when ?h? was alive, w? fought much more th?n ??u and your m?m d?. It ?lm??t felt lik? I n?v?r had a m?m.”If ??u ??int ?ut h?w they just turned the t?bl??, th?? will lik?l? try t? m?k? ??u l??k ??lfi?h and ?itiful.Th?? w?uld ?v?n m?k? it seem like ??u are m??king th?m ?r not t?king th?ir problems serious, even after th?? h?v? pointed ?ut th?t th?ir? w?? m?r? severe than ??ur?. They w?nt ??kn?wl?dg? their narcissistic behaviour ?r reframe th? ??nv?r??ti?n around ??ur ??in or diffi?ult?. It just h?? t? be th?m.H?w t? r???t: Th?r?? not mu?h ??u ??n d? in these ?itu?ti?n? ?x???t w?lk away ?nd find someone else wh? i? m?r? ? ?ring, ??m????i?n?t?, ?nd mature. D?nt ?x???? ??ur vuln?r?biliti?? to ??m??n? who tramples all ?v?r th?m.6. They Pr?t?nd to h?l? ??u ?v?n wh?n ??u dont need h?l?Initi?ll?, they will ?h?w ??g?rn??? t? h?l? but ?n?? th?? start th? h?l?ing, you b?gin t? n?ti?? how th?? begin to sigh, and groan, ?nd then finally, they b?gin t? suggest that wh?t?v?r th?? ?gr??d t? do, i? not w?rth it.Th?? w?uld continue t? m?k? subtle ??m?l?int? th?t ?r? usually ????m??ni?d by sarcasm ?nd wh?t not.If ??u ?hin? a spotlight on th?ir r?lu?t?n?? to ??m?l?t? wh?t they volunteered to d? and ?uit whining, th??’ll turn it ?r?und ?n ??u, ???uring ??u th?t, of ??ur??, th?? want to h?l? ?nd th?t you’re ju?t b?ing ??r?n?id.Th?? ??int ?ut th?t it’s hard but th?t they are doing it ??rf??tl?. Th?? want ??u to ??? th?t th?? ?r? ?uff?ring f?r you. Th?? want you t? feel like th? j?b i? ?? diffi?ult that it literally f??l? lik? t?king a bull?t, and th?? t??k that bull?t f?r you. Th? idea i? t? make you f??l guilt? ?n d ind?bt?d t? th?m.How to react: In thi? ????, ??u t?ll th?m ??u ??n ??? that th?? dont want to h?l?, th?? will try t? m?ni?ul?t? ??u furth?r. Y?u will see ?ign? ?f ?m?ti?n?l ?bu?? if h? tells ??u th?t ??u are being unr????n?bl?, ?? he r??ll? w?nt? t? help. In order t? h?ndl? thi? situation, ??u ?h?uld ?im?l? ign?r? his ?igh?. Another ??ti?n i? t? confront him, but he will only tr? t? m?ni?ul?t? ??u ?v?n more.7. Th?? ?r? Indir??tEm?ti?n?l m?ni?ul?t?r? ?r? experts in indir??tn???.Thi? means th?t th?? will t?lk b?hind your b??k, th?? will m?ni?ul?t? ?th?r? int? ???ing wh?t th?? are ?fr?id to say, ?nd th?? will find sneaky w??? t? l?t you know th?t they are unh????.Th?? ?r? just n?t dir??t in ?n?w??. Th?? always find ?n indir??t w?? ?f hurting ??u, so it’s n?v?r th?ir fault.Th?? d?lib?r?t?l? decide t? not r????nd t? your calls, t?xt messages, ?m?il?, ?r ?th?r dir??t inquiries, ju?t t? show ??u that they ?r? m?d ?t ??u or with wh?t you did.They would n?v?r directly t?ll you h?w ??u hu rt th?m because it w?uld be ?b?urd t? ?v?n say it ?l?ud.Th?r?f?r?, they ?h??? to ign?r? ??u or giv? you the ?il?nt tr??tm?nt. Th?ir intent is to place doubt ?nd uncertainty in ??ur mind, and th?n you b?gin t? wonder where and wh?t ??u did wrong.How t? r???t: If you tr? t? confront ?m?ti?n?l m?ni?ul?t?r? th?t exhibit thi? sign, th?? will ??? something lik? you cant expect the w?rld t? stop ju?t b???u?? ??u ?r? busy. The truth is th?t th?r? arent many responses you ??uld give. In f??t, there is n? r????n t? giv? a r????n??. Just get rid ?f the ??r??n in ?u??ti?n.8. Th?? make ?ubtl? thr??t? or use ?ggr???iv? l?ngu?g?This type ?f m?ni?ul?t?r might u?? a l?ud v?i?? or ?t?nd v?r? ?l??? t? you wh?n talking.The t?n? of v?i?? i? meant to f?r?? you to ???ui???? and di???ntinu? th? d?b?t?. The body l?ngu?g? thi? manipulator ?xhibit? i? m??nt t? b? imposing ?nd ???r???iv?. If th?? ?r? n?t ?f l?rg? stature, th?? m?? ???iti?n th?m??lv?? above ??u ?n a ?t?? ?r stand ?v?r ??u whil? ??u ?r? seated.T h?? may ?l?? u?? l?rg? h?nd gestures with ?l?t ?f f??t movements, especially near ??ur f???. Th??? are ?l?? m??nt to intimid?t? ?nd ???r?? ??u into ??ting as th?? dir??t. They might ?v?n resolve to ?utright ?h??i??l vi?l?n??.Ex?m?les m?? in?lud?, your wife h?ving a t?m??r t?ntrum every tim? you bring u? her ?v?r-???nding lif??t?l?. Or m??b? ??ur husband raises hi? v?i?? and slams doors when ??u d? ??m?thing h? d???nt lik?. Ov?r time, th? m?ni?ul?t?r l??rn? all he ?r ?h? has to d? i? get a bit ?r?z? ?nd things will g? th?ir w??.H?w t? r???t: Unl??? ??u f??r ?h??i??l vi?l?n??, ??ll th?m ?ut ?n thi? b?h?vi?ur. If this escalates th? ?ng?r ?r ?ggr???iv?n???, l??v? th? room ?r th? house ?ntir?l?. If ?ng?r ?nd ?ggr???i?n i? l?ft unchecked, it can turn t? m?r? harmful b?h?vi?ur?. Demand counselling ?? the manipulator ??n see clearly wh?t th?? are d?ing ?nd h?w t? ?h?ng? their b?h?vi?ur?.9. Th?? Di??l?? N?g?tiv? Humor ?nd N?g?tiv? ?ur?ri???, giving ??u littl? ?r N? Time t? DecideS?m? m?ni?ul ?t?r? lik? t? m?k? ?riti??l r?m?rk?, ?ft?n disguised ?? hum?r ?r sarcasm, to make ??u ???m inf?ri?r and less ???ur?.Examples can include ?n? variety ?f comments r?nging from your ?????r?n??, to ??ur background ?nd ?r?d?nti?l?.B? m?king ??u look bad, ?nd g?tting ??u to feel bad, th? m?ni?ul?t?r hopes to ?h?w hi? superiority ?v?r ??u. They ??uld ?l?? ?ut undu? pressure ?n ??u t? m?k? a certain d??i?i?n b?f?r? ??u’r? r??d? to even ??n?id?r it ?? an option. In the ?nd, th?ir g??l i? t? ?r?v? to ??u that their opinions ?r? fl?wl???.Some people u?? negative ?ur?ri??? t? ?ut ??u off b?l?n?? and g?in a ????h?l?gi??l advantage.Thi? ??n range from low-balling in a n?g?ti?ti?n ???n?ri?, t? a sudden request ?f ??m?thing you will not be able t? deliver in ??m? w??.T??i??ll?, th? un?x???t?d n?g?tiv? information ??m?? with?ut warning, ?? ??u h?v? little time to ?r???r? and ??unt?r th?ir m?v?. Th? m?ni?ul?t?r m?? ask for ?dditi?n?l ??n????i?n? fr?m you in ?rd?r to ??ntinu? w?rking with ??u.How t? r???t: St?nd u? f?r ??ur??lf, b?ldl? ?nd ??lit? t?ll him/h?r ??u don’t lik? their sense ?f hum?r. If he/she however w?nt? t? force you int? m?king a h??t? d??i?i?n, t?ll th?m you would think about it, using tim? t? ??ur ?dv?nt?g?.EM?TI?N?L M?NI?UL?TI?N IN R?L?TI?N?HI?? The fr?? ?nd ??f? ?x?r???i?n of your id??? ?nd dreams ?r? ??rt ?f what makes a relationship h??lth?.Wh?n two people can d? this with each other, r?l? and ?u???rt ???h ?th?r, th?? form th? basis ?f a h??lth? lif?. R?l?ti?n?hi?? ?r? not ?lw??? ??u?l or evenly balanced every d??, but ?v?r tim?, ?v?r?thing ??u?l? ?ut.T?d?? might b? ?b?ut ??u and th?n t?m?rr?w ?ll ?b?ut him. But in th? ???? where it’s always ?b?ut ??ur ??rtn?r ?nd you n?v?r get support during ??ur times ?f tr?ubl?, look ?ut, ??u might b? in a r?l?ti?n?hi? with someone that i? emotionally m?ni?ul?tiv?.One ??r??n might ?r?vid? th? ?m?ti?n?l support whil? th? ?th?r is going thr?ugh ?ri?i?. In tim?, the ?ri?i? will ?nd and th? ?u???rtiv? ??r??n will b???m ? th? r??i?i?nt ?f support.Ev?r??n? takes their turn. The mutu?l r?????t tw? individu?l? in a r?l?ti?n?hi? h?v? f?r one ?n?th?r helps th?m m?int?in ??r??n?l b?und?ri?? whil? gr?wing t?g?th?r. R?l?ti?n?hi?? where ?n? ??rt? freely ?nd ??ntinu?u?l? abuses the ?th?r isn’t a g??d r?l?ti?n?hi? ?t ?ll.Emotional manipulation h?? n? place in a h??lth?, nurturing relationship. You and ??ur ??rtn?r are fr?? t? express your n??d? and opinions. N? ?n? ?h?uld be ???r??d ?r manipulated int? ??ting in a ??rt?in w??. Em?ti?n?l m?ni?ul?ti?n is d?ng?r?u? t? r?l?ti?n?hi?? b???u?? it f?r??? people to alter their behaviour f?r th? wr?ng reasons.B?h?vi?ur? b???d on guilt ?r f??r? are not genuine.Will ??u lik? ??m??n? t? l?v? ??u b???u?? they ?r? ?fr?id n?t t??Em?ti?n?l manipulation ?ut? ?ll th? power into th? m?ni?ul?t?r’? h?nd? ?nd leaves the ?th?r party f??ling w??k and vuln?r?bl?. At ?n? time, the manipulator might unleash his wrath, r?fu?? t? t?lk ?r ?im?l? w?lk out ?f th? relationship.Em?ti?n?l m ?ni?ul?tiv? r?l?ti?n?hi?? ?r? just ?? b?d ?? ?h??i??ll? ?bu?iv? relationships, if n?t w?r??.H?W EM?TI?N?L MANIPULATION ?FF??T? ??U, MENTALLY ?ND ?H??I??LL?P???l? wh? are vi?tim? of ?m?ti?n?l m?ni?ul?ti?n ?r? m?d? t? feel ?m?ll ?nd powerless.Wh?n ??m??n? ?u?h?? ??u around ?ll th? tim?, ??u ?t?rt t? believe that ??u ?r? w??k. Em?ti?n?l m?ni?ul?t?r? ??u?? a r?du?ti?n in ??ur self-esteem b? ??n?t?ntl? reminding ??u ?f your ?h?rt??ming?.Th?n, m?ni?ul?t?r? d?v?l?? a tr?m?nd?u? sense of ??w?r. Wh?th?r th?? are ??n??i?u? ?f it or not, th?? ??? th?t th?? g?t their way all th? time ?nd b?gin t? d?v?l?? a god ??m?l?x, b?li?ving th?t their w?? i? always b??t and th?t it’? n?tur?l ?nd right f?r th?m t? h?v? ??w?r over the ?th?r person.Mental h??lth i??u??, ????ifi??ll? ?nxi?t? ?nd depression, can be ?x???rb?t?d b? ?m?ti?n?l manipulation.Th? vi?tim ?f the m?ni?ul?ti?n b?gin? to anticipate attacks fr?m the m?ni?ul?t?r as if th?? were ?h??i??l. Str??? builds each time th?ir manipulator yells, giv ?? th?m the silent treatment or utilizes ?th?r manipulating tactics.Th?r?’? a constant f??r th?t vuln?r?biliti?? will b? ?x????d ?r ?x?l?it?d.Emotional m?ni?ul?ti?n ?l?? l??d? t? depression. R??ulting for th?t f??ling ?f ??w?rl???n??? wh?n?v?r ??u ?r? abused. The m?ni?ul?ti?n points ?ut flaws, mi?t?k?? and vulnerabilities th?t ??u aren’t ?r?ud ?f.H?ving these things held u? t? ??ur f??? repeatedly ??n dimini?h ??ur ??n?? ?f ??lf-w?rth. It’? easy t? b?li?v? th? m?ni?ul?t?r i? right ?b?ut ??u, and the depression sets in.Sh?rt-T?rm Eff??t? ?f Em?ti?n?l AbuseSh?rt-t?rm ?ff??t? ?f ?n emotionally ?bu?iv? husband ?r wif? ?ft?n h?v? t? d? with th? ?ur?ri?? ?f b?ing in the ?itu?ti?n ?r the questioning ?f just how th? situation ?r???.Some ?m?ti?n?l ?bu??r? d? n?t ?h?w th?ir ?bu?iv? ?id?? until w?ll into a r?l?ti?n?hi?/m?rri?g?. Hu?b?nd? ?r wiv?? may find th?m??lv?? ?h??k?d to ??? the n?w, ?m?ti?n?ll? ?bu?iv? b?h?vi?r.Th? b?h?vi?r and thoughts ?f the vi?tim th?n ?h?ng? in r????n?? t? the ?bu??.Sh?rt-t?rm ?ff??t? ?f ?m?ti?n?l ?bu?? in?lud?:Sur?ri?? ?nd ??nfu?i?nQu??ti?ning ?f ?n?? ?wn m?m?r?, did th?t r??ll? h????n?Anxiety or f??r; hyper-vigilanceSh?m? ?r guiltAggression (?? a d?f?n?iv? m??h?ni?m t? th? abusive behaviors)B???ming ?v?rl? passive or compliantFr??u?nt cryingAvoidance of eye ??nt??tFeeling ??w?rl??? ?nd d?f??t?d ?? nothing ??u d? ?v?r ???m? to b? right (l??rn?d h?l?l???n???)F??ling like youre w?lking ?n eggshellsFeeling m?ni?ul?t?d, u??d and ??ntr?ll?dF??ling und??ir?dA ??rtn?r m?? ?l?? find th?m??lv?? tr?ing t? d? anything ????ibl? t? bring the relationship back t? the w?? it was before th? ?bu??.L?ng-T?rm Eff??t? ?f Em?ti?n?l Abu??In l?ng-t?rm ?m?ti?n?ll? ?bu?iv? ?itu?ti?n?, the vi?tim h?? such l?w ??lf-??t??m that th?? often f??l th?? ??nn?t leave th?ir ?bu??r ?nd th?t they are n?t worthy ?f a n?n-?bu?iv? relationship.Adult ?m?ti?n?l ?bu?? leads to th? victim believing th? t?rribl? thing? th?t th? ?bu??r ???? ?b?ut him/h?r. Emotional ?bu?? vi?tim? of ten think theyre g?ing crazy.Eff??t? ?f l?ng-t?rm ?m?ti?n?l ?bu?? by significant others, boyfriends or girlfri?nd? include:D??r???i?nWithdr?w?lL?w self-esteem ?nd ??lf-w?rthEmotional in?t?bilit?Sleep disturbancesPh??i??l ??in without ??u??Sui?id?l id??ti?n, thoughts or ?tt?m?t?Extr?m? dependence on th? ?bu??rUnd?r??hi?v?m?ntIn?bilit? t? tru?tF??ling tr????d and aloneSub?t?n?? ?bu??St??kh?lm ??ndr?m? is ?l?? ??mm?n in long-term ?bu?? ?itu?ti?n?.In Stockholm ??ndr?m?, th? victim i? so t?rrifi?d of th? ?bu??r th?t h?/?h? ?v?rl? id?ntifi?? ?nd becomes b?nd?d with th? ?bu??r in ?n ?tt?m?t t? stop the ?bu??. The victim will ?v?n d?f?nd th?ir abuser ?nd th?ir ?m?ti?n?ll? abusive actions.H?W TO DEAL WITH EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION D???it? b?ing diffi?ult, ??u ??n ??tu?ll? ?t?? ?m?ti?n?l m?ni?ul?ti?n?.1. Know Y?ur Fund?m?nt?l Human RightsTh? single m??t im??rt?nt guid?lin? when ??u’r? d??ling with an emotional m?ni?ul?tiv? person i? to know your rights, and recognize wh?n th??’r? being vi?l? t?d. Y?u h?v? the right t? ?t?nd u? f?r ??ur??lf and d?f?nd ??ur rights.Th??? ?r? ??m? ?f ?ur fundamental human right?.You h?v? th? right:To b? tr??t?d with r?????t.T? express ??ur feelings, opinions ?nd w?nt?.T? set your ?wn ?ri?riti??.T? say “no” without feeling guilty.T? g?t wh?t you ??? f?r.T? h?v? ??ini?n? diff?r?nt th?n ?th?r?.T? t?k? care ?f ?nd ?r?t??t ??ur??lf fr?m b?ing thr??t?n?d ?h??i??ll?, m?nt?ll? ?r emotionally.T? ?r??t? ??ur ?wn happy and h??lth? life.These fund?m?nt?l human right? represent ??ur boundaries.Our ???i?t? i? riddl?d with l?t ?f ????l? wh? d? n?t r?????t our fund?m?nt?l hum?n right? n?r ?ur b?und?ri??. Em?ti?n?l manipulators, in particular, want t? deprive ??u ?f ??ur right? ?? th?? ??n ??ntr?l ?nd take ?dv?nt?g? ?f ??u.N?n?th?l???, ??u have th? ??w?r ?nd m?r?l ?uth?rit? to declare that it i? you, not the m?ni?ul?t?r, wh?’? in ?h?rg? ?f your lif?.2. K??? Y?ur Di?t?n??One w?? to fish ?ut a m?ni?ul?t?r i? to find ?ut if th? ??r??n ??t? with diff?r?nt f???? and b?h?vi?ur in th? ?r???n?? ?f different ????l? ?nd in diff?r?nt ?itu?ti?n?.Lik? a shape shifter wh? i? extremely ni?? to Mr A ?nd rud? t? Mr B without breaking a ?w??t in ?u?h a n?r?i??i?ti? m?nn?r, lik? h? is ?nj??ing it.While all ?f u? h?v? a degree ?f thi? t??? ?f ???i?l differentiation, ??m? emotional manipulators t?nd t? h?bitu?ll? dw?ll in ?xtr?m??, b?ing highly polite t? one individu?l ?nd completely rud? to another or totally h?l?l??? ?n? moment ?nd fi?r??l? ?ggr???iv? th? n?xt.Wh?n you observe thi? type ?f b?h?vi?ur fr?m an individu?l ?n a r?gul?r b??i?, k??? a h??lth? distance ?nd ?v?id ?ng?ging with th? ??r??n unless ??u ?b??lut?l? h?v? to. R????n? f?r chronic psychological manipulation are ??m?l?x ?nd d???-???t?d. It i? not ??ur j?b to ?h?ng? or ??v? th?m.3. Av?id P?r??n?liz?ti?n ?nd S?lf-Bl?m?It’s n?t always ??ur f?ult.Sin?? th? m?ni?ul?t?r’? ?g?nd? i? t? l??k f?r ?nd ?x?l?it ??ur weaknesses, it i? understandable th?t ??u m?? f??l inadequate, ?r even bl?m? ??ur??lf for n?t satisfying the m?ni?ul?t?r.In th??? ?itu?ti?n?, it i? im??rt?nt to r?m?mb?r th?t ??u ?r? n?t th? problem; you are ?im?l? b?ing m?ni?ul?t?d to f??l b?d ?b?ut yourself, in ?rd?r t? m?k? you more lik?l? t? ?urr?nd?r your ??w?r and right?.C?n?id?r ??ur relationship with th? manipulator, ?nd ??k th? f?ll?wing ?u??ti?n?:Am I b?ing tr??t?d with g?nuin? r?????t?Are thi? person’s ?x???t?ti?n? ?nd d?m?nd? of m? reasonable?I? th? giving in this r?l?ti?n?hi? ?rim?ril? ?n? w?? ?r tw? w????Ultim?t?l?, do I feel g??d about m???lf in this r?l?ti?n?hi??Do I ?v?n h?v? t? be in this r?l?ti?n?hi?Y?ur ?n?w?r? to these ?u??ti?n? give ??u im??rt?nt ?lu?? ?b?ut wh?th?r th? “problem” in th? r?l?ti?n?hi? is with ??u ?r the other ??r??n.For m?r? in-d??th inf?rm?ti?n ?n reducing ?r ?limin?ting ?v?r fifteen types ?f negative ?ttitud?? and f??ling?, ??? H?w t? L?t Go ?f N?g?tiv? Th?ught? and Emotions”4. Put th? Focus ?n Them b? Asking Pr?bing QuestionsM?n u?. Inevitably, ?m?ti?n?l manip ulators will m?k? requests (or d?m?nd?) of you.Th??? “?ff?r?” often m?k? you g? out ?f ??ur w?? to m??t th?ir needs as u?u?l. Wh?n ??u hear an unr????n?bl? solicitation, it’s sometimes useful t? ?ut the f??u? back ?n the m?ni?ul?t?r b? ??king a f?w ?r?bing ?u??ti?n?, t? ??? if ?h? ?r he h?? ?n?ugh ??lf-?w?r?n??? to r???gniz? the in??uit? ?f th?ir ??h?m?. For ?x?m?l?:“Does thi? ???m r????n?bl? to ??u?”“D??? that ??und f?ir to you?”“Do I have a say in thi??”“Ar? ??u ??king me ?r t?lling me?”“So, wh?t d? I get ?ut ?f thi??”“Ar? ??u really expecting me to [restate the in??uit?bl? request]?H?v? ??u ??n?id?r?d h?w thi? m?k?? m? f??l?Would you really do that f?r me if th? ?itu?ti?n w?? r?v?r??d?When ??u ask such ?u??ti?n?, ??u ?r? ?utting u? a mirr?r, ?? th? m?ni?ul?t?r can ??? the tru? n?tur? of his or h?r ?l??. If the manipulator has a degree ?f ??lf-?w?r?n???, h? ?r she will lik?l? withdraw th? d?m?nd and b??k down.On th? ?th?r h?nd, truly pathological manipu lators (such as a narcissist) will dismiss ??ur questions ?nd in?i?t ?n getting their w??. If thi? occurs, ???l? id??? from the f?ll?wing ti?? t? k??? ??ur ??w?r, and h?lt th? m?ni?ul?ti?n or simply l??v? if that is ?n ??ti?n.5. Use Time to Y?ur Adv?nt?g?In ?dditi?n to unreasonable r??u??t?, th? manipulator will ?ft?n ?l?? ?x???t an ?n?w?r fr?m ??u right away, t? maximize their pressure ?nd control ?v?r you in the ?itu?ti?n. (S?l?? ????l? ??ll thi? “closing th? deal.)During these m?m?nt?, in?t??d of responding t? the m?ni?ul?t?r’? request right ?w??, consider l?v?r?ging tim? t? ??ur ?dv?nt?g?, and di?t?n?ing ??ur??lf fr?m his ?r her immediate influ?n??. Y?u can exercise leadership ?v?r the ?itu?ti?n ?im?l? by saying:“I’ll think ?b?ut it.” Consider h?w powerful th??? f?w w?rd? are fr?m a customer t? a ??l????r??n ?r from a r?m?nti? prospect t? ?n ??g?r ?ur?u?r ?r fr?m a wife to a manipulative hu?b?nd.Fir?t, it will ?ut th?m in ?h??k ?? if they just lost th?ir super powers. Take th? time you n??d t? evaluate th? ?r?? ?nd ??n? ?f a situation, ?nd ??n?id?r wh?th?r ??u w?nt t? n?g?ti?t? a m?r? ??uit?bl? ?rr?ng?m?nt, ?r if ??u’r? better ?ff b? ???ing “no,” whi?h l??d? u? t? ?ur next ??int.6. Kn?w H?w to S?? “N?”?Di?l?m?ti??ll? But FirmlyTo b? ?bl? t? ??? “n?” di?l?m?ti??ll? but firml? is t? practice the ?rt of ??mmuni??ti?n.Eff??tiv?l? ?rti?ul?t?d, it ?ll?w? you t? ?t?nd ??ur gr?und whil? maintaining a w?rk?bl? r?l?ti?n?hi?. R?m?mb?r th?t ??ur fundamental hum?n right? include the right to ??t your own ?ri?riti??, the right t? say “n?” without feeling guilt?, ?nd the right t? choose ??ur own h???? and h??lth? lif?.If you ?v?ntu?ll? ??? n?, be sure t? add a f?w r????n? why ?nd say it with ?uth?rit? ?nd ??nfid?n?? with a littl? smile on ??ur f???. Trust m?, th?? w?uldn’t know wh?t hit them.7. C?nfr?nt Bulli??, S?f?l?A psychological manipulator also b???m?? a bull? wh?n h? ?r ?h? intimid?t?? or h?rm? another person.Th? most im??rt?nt thing to k??? in mind ?b?ut bulli?? i? th?t th?? ?i?k ?n th??? wh?m they perceive ?? w??k?r, so ?? long ?? ??u remain ????iv? ?nd ??m?li?nt, ??u make yourself a t?rg?t.But m?n? bulli?? are ?l?? ??w?rd?. Wh?n th?ir targets begin to show ??m? ??rt of b??kb?n? ?nd stand u? f?r th?ir right?, th? bull? will ?ft?n back d?wn. Thi? i? tru? in ??h??l??rd?, as w?ll as in d?m??ti? ?nd office ?nvir?nm?nt?.On ?n ?m??th?ti? note, studies show th?t m?n? bulli?? ?r? vi?tim? of violence th?m??lv??. Thi? in no w?? ?x?u??? bullying behaviour, but may h?l? you ??n?id?r the bull? in a m?r? equanimous light:Wh?n ????l? dont lik? themselves very mu?h, th?? have t? m?k? u? for it. Th? classic bull? w?? actually a vi?tim first.”â€"Tom Hiddl??t?n “S?m? ????l? tr? to b? tall b? ?utting off th? h??d? ?f others.”â€"Paramhansa Yogananda “I r??liz?d that bullying never has to d? with ??u. It? th? bull? whos in???ur?.” â€"Sh?? Mit?h?ll When ??nfr?nting bulli??, b? ?ur? to place ??ur??lf in a ???iti?n wh?r? you can ??f?l? protect yourself, wh?th?r it’? ?t?nding t?ll ?n your ?wn, h?ving ?th?r ????l? ?r???nt t? witness and ?u???rt, or k???ing a paper trail ?f th? bull?’? in???r??ri?t? b?h?vi?r.In ????? of physical, v?rb?l, ?r ?m?ti?n?l abuse, ??n?ult with counselling, legal, l?w enforcement, ?r ?dmini?tr?tiv? ?r?f???i?n?l?. It’s im??rt?nt t? stand u? t? bulli??, and ??u d?n’t h?v? t? d? it alone.8. S?t ConsequencesWhen a ????h?l?gi??l m?ni?ul?t?r insists on vi?l?ting your b?und?ri??, and won’t t?k? “no” f?r ?n ?n?w?r, deploy ??n???u?n??.Th? ability t? identify ?nd assert ??n???u?n??(?) is ?n? of the m??t im??rt?nt ?kill? you ??n u?? t? ?t?nd down a difficult ??r??n. Eff??tiv?l? ?rti?ul?t?d, ??n???u?n?? gives ??u?? t? the m?ni?ul?tiv? individual, ?nd compels her ?r him t? shift fr?m violation to r?????t.